rejetto forum

Software => HFS ~ HTTP File Server => Beta => Topic started by: rejetto on November 18, 2013, 07:58:22 PM

Title: Testing build #287
Post by: rejetto on November 18, 2013, 07:58:22 PM
download @ www.melauto.it/rejetto/beta/hfs287.exe

what's new
* a 169-class address is now considered worse than other local addresses
- {.delete.} was not always working with wildcards [link] (http://www.rejetto.com/forum/italiano/messaggio-x-rejetto-~cancellamessaggi-non-funzionante-su-hfs-285-11170/)
Title: Re: Testing build #287
Post by: noobuser on December 23, 2013, 04:30:08 AM
Self test error " Sorry, the test is unavailable at the moment". It seems that this new version the default port is 8080. During the self test when you change to port 80 it gives an error and put back to port 8080. I've used port 80 and configured correctly in terms of port forwarding in firewalls (2 firewall) and router so I change port 8080 to 80. Using an online port scanner there is no problem on port 80 but in this version HFS self test it gives error. That's all error I found for now.

Thanks. It's a good and useful app.
Title: Re: Testing build #287
Post by: rejetto on December 23, 2013, 10:07:27 PM
that problem is not related to the version.
The self-test is not needed, is just a convenience.
If your HFS works there's no need for a test.
Anyway it's not working at the moment.
Title: Re: Testing build #287
Post by: noobuser on December 24, 2013, 03:19:04 AM
Ok.. Just telling because it might confuse with others. I turned it off at night it runs only day time.
Title: Re: Testing build #287
Post by: raybob on February 17, 2014, 03:58:54 PM
Is this the same build that became the official 2.3?
Title: Re: Testing build #287
Post by: rejetto on February 18, 2014, 01:51:54 AM
nope, i remember there are ere 2 bugfixes in #288
Title: Re: Testing build #287
Post by: DSGJ on September 05, 2014, 10:45:49 AM
@ rejetto What Bugs where there?  :)
Title: Re: Testing build #287
Post by: rejetto on September 14, 2014, 11:50:50 AM
sorry i lost track of them.
It can be deduced by comparing the 2 sources, but i cannot do it.
Title: Re: Testing build #287
Post by: MelkiyProd. on November 27, 2014, 05:48:21 PM
Rejetto, how about to add "target="_blank" to "Link" in HFS?  :) Will able to choose between a simple link and a "target_blank" link.
Title: Re: Testing build #287
Post by: Mars on November 28, 2014, 01:18:07 PM
to create a new blank tab in the browserfrom HFS link, I know these two solutions

add a new link containing   about:blank

or

add on vfs an html file containing

<META HTTP-EQUIV="Refresh" CONTENT="0; URL=about:blank">
<!-- META HTTP-EQUIV="Pragma" CONTENT="no-cache" -->