rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
 Offline
 Italy
Posts: 11822
|
 |
« on: October 04, 2003, 01:08:48 PM » |
|
1.5 has reached stable level :happy: congratulations to beta-testers  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
Offline
Italy
Posts: 11822
|
|
« Reply #2 on: October 04, 2003, 02:26:45 PM » |
|
webattack is already scheduled.
i have problems updating SF at home, because my connection is poor and their ftp server does not support resume. i will when i can.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
boisso
Guest
|
|
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2003, 10:43:05 AM » |
|
stable ? It's easy to crash it though when browsing folders quickly. It may not be its purpose, but it would be nice if it could be more robust. I tried it with a friend and it crashed quickly, making ton of dialog box with "Access Violation ..."  Else it looks very nice, I was looking for something like that since a while now. Feel free to ask if you need info about this crash. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rejetto-
Guest
|
|
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2003, 11:50:03 AM » |
|
stable ? It's easy to crash it though when browsing folders quickly. It may not be its purpose, but it would be nice if it could be more robust. I tried it with a friend and it crashed quickly, making ton of dialog box with "Access Violation ..." i see it was "stable" because people didn't submit bugs to fix a bug i need a way to reproduce it myself. please describe how to crash in details so that i can reproduce it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rejetto forum
|
|
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2003, 11:50:03 AM » |
|
Do you like this software?
Consider even $2
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
boisso
Guest
|
|
« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2003, 12:38:01 PM » |
|
The simple way to reproduce it would be just hitting F5 (refresh) several time. But it's a little violent, I wouldn't say anything if it was only that. I mounted a folder with some subfolders and it crashed when i've just browsed them quickly (when i say quickly, you don't wait for the page to be loaded completely). Tested with a friend : he can crash my hsf server and I can crash his server too doing that. We're both running on wxp sp1. I guess it happen because the browser make too many connection in a short amount of time. Using a limit for the number of connection didn't help though  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rafi
|
|
« Reply #7 on: October 05, 2003, 12:54:34 PM » |
|
I tried that on Win 98SE, IE6 SP1 - and it was OK ! (used - c:\program files ...)
What browser are you using ?
BTW -
is there a restriction on adding a complete disk to the file system? seems to me that it does NOT generate a directory tree for a complete disk ...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Guest
|
|
« Reply #8 on: October 05, 2003, 04:07:25 PM » |
|
I tried that on Win 98SE, IE6 SP1 - and it was OK ! (used - c:\program files ...)
What browser are you using ?
IE6 sp1 too, but I found it do it only when you set a speed limit (speed limit was 5Kb/s). BTW -
is there a restriction on adding a complete disk to the file system? seems to me that it does NOT generate a directory tree for a complete disk ... It works fine with me.[/quote] |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rafi
|
|
« Reply #9 on: October 05, 2003, 04:40:57 PM » |
|
IE6 sp1 too, but I found it do it only when you set a speed limit (speed limit was 5Kb/s).
Yep, got it to crash too... Just had to press a few times F5 ... I think the speed limit - "helped" ... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
Offline
Italy
Posts: 11822
|
|
« Reply #10 on: October 05, 2003, 06:22:53 PM » |
|
fixed well, i'm not sure it is definitely fixed, it could be not for MANY connections. i actually don't know WHY it was crashing, but i saw that all broken connections (when you don't wait for it to be served) were pending in the queue. They were not removed from the queue on client disconnection. And i saw the queue was long. The queue is used only when the server has no speed limit (and it is not paused). Now the queue is shorter than before, because it is purged on client disconnection. I fear the problem is still there but it is sleeping, because the queue is short. But it could be ok if it can hold 5-10 users browsing. would you test it? http://www.uniroma1.com/rejetto/temp/hfs.exei will publish 1.5b after your tests |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
boisso
Guest
|
|
« Reply #11 on: October 06, 2003, 01:19:27 AM » |
|
You guessed it right, but it's far more robust now. Good work. It gave me a hard time to crash it. It happened eventually, but i used ten windows at the same time to do it, and it crashed only one time.
For me, it's good : when connecting from internet it's not easy to make so much connection (except if it's a DoS attack), I don't think I'll get problem with a "normal" usage.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rafi
|
|
« Reply #12 on: October 06, 2003, 01:47:53 AM » |
|
fixed...
i will publish 1.5b after your tests Very much better now! I also got one error "index out of range" (  ) but could not recreate it... BTW - When I enter a whole driver c: into the VFS I do not see the - and the tree. should it be like that ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
Offline
Italy
Posts: 11822
|
|
« Reply #13 on: October 06, 2003, 03:54:44 AM » |
|
well, i would like to improve stability further
i already noticed that "drives" support is not good
it is possible to share them with right-click, add folder, but file icons are wrong
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rafi
|
|
« Reply #14 on: October 06, 2003, 02:05:13 PM » |
|
Can you check, please, if the option to have the "Get Right" browser is ON is the default for a new installation ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
