rejetto forum
February 12, 2012, 01:54:51 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: This forum is free, you do NOT need to register to post. But you may.
PROBLEMS? QUESTIONS? CLICK HERE!
Fill the survey!
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Testing build #104  (Read 4190 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
*
Offline Offline

Italy Italy

Posts: 11759


View Profile
« on: June 18, 2007, 06:59:23 PM »

www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs104.exe

what's new
+ smarter bandwidth division (between connections)
+ specific warning messages on some limits
- problems with the "always on top"
- "no download" broken in #103
- no "not found" page was given for unexistant URLs
- problem with "confirm exit" and windows shutdown
- download got corrupted if resumed after 2GB 
Logged
Garphy
Experienced poster
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 80


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2007, 12:35:26 AM »

still corrupts vfs while cancel loading on startup...
Logged
Wasserfloh
Experienced poster
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 79



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2007, 01:42:07 PM »

Why is Build 104 three times as large as the previous?
Logged
MarkV
Insane poster
*****
Offline Offline

Germany Germany

Posts: 722



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2007, 02:48:39 PM »

Why is Build 104 three times as large as the previous?

build #103 is compressed with UPX, build #104 is not.
Logged

Welcome to Twinkle Park! Grin
rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
*
Offline Offline

Italy Italy

Posts: 11759


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 20, 2007, 02:18:39 AM »

UPX compression is not compatible with the debug symbols.
every stable/official relase is compressed, test versions may not be.
Logged
User
Guest


Email
« Reply #5 on: June 20, 2007, 01:13:25 PM »

Please pack all beta's in archive (if this not problem for you) , it's saving traffic and money for testers Smiley
Logged
rejetto forum
« Reply #5 on: June 20, 2007, 01:13:25 PM »

Do you like this software? Consider even $2
 Logged
rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
*
Offline Offline

Italy Italy

Posts: 11759


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 20, 2007, 07:27:55 PM »

would anyone actually save time/money if the beta is 0.5 instead of 1.5MB ?
Logged
maverick
Insane poster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1056


Computer Solutions


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 20, 2007, 11:38:39 PM »

would anyone actually save time/money if the beta is 0.5 instead of 1.5MB ?

The only ones that "may" save time/money would be those using a 56k or lower dialup modem connection.  I doubt there would be many that would use such a connection running a server like HFS.

Are you again including debug code within HFS like you used to?  If so, that would explain the file size difference.

Logged

maverick
rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
*
Offline Offline

Italy Italy

Posts: 11759


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 21, 2007, 02:15:56 AM »

sure, i said it above
Logged
Garphy
Experienced poster
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 80


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: June 21, 2007, 09:40:00 AM »

bug report:
~nodefault unavailable in 104...
Logged
rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
*
Offline Offline

Italy Italy

Posts: 11759


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 21, 2007, 11:03:31 AM »

fixed from next build
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!


Google visited last this page February 09, 2012, 08:44:06 PM
anything