|
Foggy
|
 |
« on: January 31, 2008, 02:32:40 AM » |
|
I just noticed that when you restrict access to a link you get a warning dialog saying it isn't actually protected etc, but should the warning also be displayed when you unrestrict access to it?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
 Offline
 Italy
Posts: 11829
|
|
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2008, 06:01:48 AM » |
|
1. if you are unrestricting, then you restricted before, than you already saw the warning
2. what should i warn about exactly?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Foggy
|
|
« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2008, 07:59:47 AM » |
|
remove the warning when you unrestrict the link because it applies for when you are restricting it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
Offline
Italy
Posts: 11829
|
|
« Reply #3 on: January 31, 2008, 09:25:39 AM » |
|
don't understand the answer
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TSG
|
|
« Reply #4 on: January 31, 2008, 08:02:14 PM » |
|
Foggy so far your whole thread isn't making any sense to me....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
Offline
Italy
Posts: 11829
|
|
« Reply #5 on: January 31, 2008, 08:36:57 PM » |
|
and your nickname is not helping
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rejetto forum
|
|
« Reply #5 on: January 31, 2008, 08:36:57 PM » |
|
Do you like this software?
Consider even $2
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TCube
|
|
« Reply #6 on: January 31, 2008, 10:55:55 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 31, 2008, 11:10:03 PM by TCube »
|
Logged
|
Make it idiot-proof and I will make a better idiot
|
|
|
|
MarkV
|
|
« Reply #7 on: February 01, 2008, 03:03:41 AM » |
|
Links are NOT actually protected. ... This warning is displayed everytime you change 'Restrict access' on a link. HFS makes no difference between enabling or disabling protection. It's displayed always. Is the fog clearing?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Welcome to Twinkle Park!  |
|
|
|
Foggy
|
|
« Reply #8 on: February 01, 2008, 07:05:49 AM » |
|
I just thought that it shouldn't be displayed when you remove access restrictions on a link because the message that is displayed is only related/valid for when links are restricted. Either way it's not a big deal, it just makes more sense to me this way. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
Offline
Italy
Posts: 11829
|
|
« Reply #9 on: February 01, 2008, 07:07:10 AM » |
|
i thought it was already this way!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Foggy
|
|
« Reply #10 on: February 01, 2008, 07:44:44 AM » |
|
using build 177 the message is displayed when ever I add restrictions or remove restrictions but as I said before it's not a big deal.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Foggy
|
|
« Reply #11 on: February 01, 2008, 07:40:35 PM » |
|
Yes, mars I got it thank you  I don't think I'm making much sense with my explanation, so I might not worry about it because it is only a small problem in my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
Offline
Italy
Posts: 11829
|
|
« Reply #12 on: February 01, 2008, 09:22:35 PM » |
|
hey, i meant i will fix it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bacter
|
|
« Reply #13 on: February 02, 2008, 02:44:00 AM » |
|
That's one of the best of all the unrestricted threads in the forum! I like it!  Perhaps a restricted fix of locked emails with unrestricted links to restricted warnings produces unrestricted, foggy links to warnings about restricting and unrestricting! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
your computer has no brain - use your own !
|
|
|
|
