rejetto forum
May 25, 2012, 12:44:15 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: This forum is free, you do NOT need to register to post. But you may.
PROBLEMS? QUESTIONS? CLICK HERE!
Fill the survey!
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: Testing build #228  (Read 6349 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
*
Offline Offline

Italy Italy

Posts: 11830


View Profile
« on: February 27, 2009, 04:48:51 PM »
(sorry for the #227  Roll Eyes)

download @ www.dovedove.it/hfs/hfs228.exe

what's new
+ {.from table|$section|key.} will now work on [sections] as it did for variables
+ improved Windows links support (*.lnk)   
+ new template macro: set table
* {.get|can archive.} even in [file] will always refer to the folder. Use {.get|can archive item.} instead
- {.time.} broken in build #223 [link]
- virtual files inside real folders were not working with folder archive
- single files could be downloaded via folder archive without necessary permissions
- file properties graphical glitches [link]
Logged
Mars
Operator
Insane poster
*****
Online Online

France France

Posts: 1481



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2009, 06:44:58 PM »
My solution which you resumed  for 227 is incomplete because it takes back the completeness of the text of the sharing and not only the name of the sharing

sharing name : folder1

vfsname : folder1 on computer xxx

it is not good
Quote
  if fn = '' then continue;
  if isExtension(fn, '.lnk')                                 //add by mars
    or directoryExists(fn) and fileExists(fn+'\target.lnk')  //add by mars
    then fn:=resolveLnk(fn);                                 //add by mars  f:=Tfile.create(fn);
  if f.isFolder() then

into utillib.pas , the update in not enough
the text in blue is really necessary Wink
Logged
Mars
Operator
Insane poster
*****
Online Online

France France

Posts: 1481



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2009, 07:28:01 PM »
big  Grin
Quote
<html>
<body>
{.^$mars.}
{.if not|{.^$mars.}| You have to init it by 'FROM TABLE' with a bad request.}
<br>
{.from table|$mars|mars.}
{.^$mars.}
<hr>
{.from table|$mars|li2.}
<br>
{.^$mars.}
<br>
{.$mars.}
</body>
</html>

[mars]
li1=line1
li2=line2
li3=line3

give :
Quote
You have to init it with 'FROM TABLE'
li1=line1 li2=line2 li3=line3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
line2
li1=line1 li2=line2 li3=line3
li1=line1 li2=line2 li3=line3


GOOD :two ways to call sections Wink

OOPS, I do not believe that it is going to please in rejetto, him who does not love the doubles. Grin Grin Grin Grin
« Last Edit: February 27, 2009, 07:42:54 PM by mars » Logged
rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
*
Offline Offline

Italy Italy

Posts: 11830


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2009, 07:10:12 AM »
Quote from: mars on February 27, 2009, 06:44:58 PM
My solution which you resumed  for 227 is incomplete because it takes back the completeness of the text of the sharing and not only the name of the sharing

Quote
  if fn = '' then continue;
  if isExtension(fn, '.lnk')                                 //add by mars
    or directoryExists(fn) and fileExists(fn+'\target.lnk')  //add by mars
    then fn:=resolveLnk(fn);                                 //add by mars 
f:=Tfile.create(fn);
  if f.isFolder() then

do you see the Tfile.create?
it calls Tfile.setResource, which is checking for "target.lnk".
so, the work is done anyway.

Quote
sharing name : folder1
vfsname : folder1 on computer xxx

i tested this, and found a bug, but a different one:
folder1\folder2  ->  folder1
anyway, this has been fixed for next build. I can give a preview if you want to test and see if your problem has consequentially been fixed.
Logged
rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
*
Offline Offline

Italy Italy

Posts: 11830


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2009, 07:15:14 AM »
Quote from: mars on February 27, 2009, 07:28:01 PM
OOPS, I do not believe that it is going to please in rejetto, him who does not love the doubles. Grin Grin Grin Grin

in programming you usually have many ways of doing things.
but the tools should not overlap intentionally. it's a side effect. Wink
Logged
Mars
Operator
Insane poster
*****
Online Online

France France

Posts: 1481



View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: February 28, 2009, 12:26:37 PM »
Since the last modifications concerning the drag and drop, the warning on doubloons does not appear any more, what makes that a big part of the code of the procedure became useless

Quote
{
// warn upon double filenames
doubles:=NIL;
s:=files;
while s > '' do
   begin
  fn:=chopLine(s);
  if isExtension(fn, '.lnk')
//  or directoryExists(fn) and fileExists(fn+'\target.lnk') // mod by mars
  then fn:=resolveLnk(fn);

  if (length(fn) = 3) and (fn[2] = ':') then fn:=fn[1]+fn[2] // unit root folder
   else fn:=ExtractFileName(fn);
mainfrm.add2log(fn);
  if existsNodeWithName(fn, under) then
    if addString(fn, doubles) > MAX_DUPE then
      break;
  end;
if assigned(doubles) then
  begin
  filesBox.Repaint();
  res:=length(doubles);
  s:=if_(res > MAX_DUPE, intToStr(MAX_DUPE)+'+', intToStr(res));
  s:=format(MSG1, [s, join(', ',doubles)]);
  if msgDlg(s, MB_ICONWARNING+MB_YESNO) <> IDYES then exit;
  end;
}

with it or whitout the result is the same, an duplicate name is incremeted (x+1) without warning


Quote
I tested this, and found a bug, but a different one:
folder1\folder2  ->  folder1
anyway, this has been fixed for next build. I can give a preview if you want to test and see if your problem has consequentially been fixed.
Yes you can and you have to do it Wink
Logged
rejetto forum
« Reply #5 on: February 28, 2009, 12:26:37 PM »
Do you like this software? Consider even $2
 Logged
rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
*
Offline Offline

Italy Italy

Posts: 11830


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 28, 2009, 12:38:29 PM »
Quote from: mars on February 28, 2009, 12:26:37 PM
with it or whitout the result is the same, an duplicate name is incremeted (x+1) without warning

the check for "doubles" was made mainly to give the user the message dialog.
when you add 2 files with same name in the same folder, it's likely you are going in troubles, so better be warned.


Quote
Yes you can and you have to do it Wink

ok, coming!
Logged
FRENCH CAN CAN
Insane poster
*****
Offline Offline

Italy Italy

Posts: 641


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2009, 02:41:49 PM »
Bugs in this version, the archive is corrupted.

Bug anche in questa versione, l'archivio è danneggiato.

Screenshot:

* Error folder .tar.JPG (84.97 KB, 1024x768 - viewed 301 times.)
Logged
Mars
Operator
Insane poster
*****
Online Online

France France

Posts: 1481



View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: March 01, 2009, 05:27:40 PM »
I agree FRENCH CAN CAN.

 rejetto, you have to do an other version of servetar the last one is very very bad

selection(boolean) is not defined correctly at the end of addSelection(); and some subdirs or files in a real folder are not included or total size not correct Sad
Logged
r][m
Insane poster
*****
Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 340


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 01, 2009, 10:13:35 PM »
This may not be revelant to topic but heres what I see.

I have protected virtural folder A. Inside is protected real folder B. Then inside B is C, then inside C is D.
Files inside D produce corrupt .tar of 512k. Move the files up to C, the .tar is OK
They download OK from D as single files. Test done with known good files.

After downloading .tar using default tpl with 228, check boxes remain checked after
download is completed. Any furthur action on the folder/page causes the download
to start again.

Selectable delete works in diff tpl, but after adding new selectable archive section, neither work.
Both work in main tpl.
« Last Edit: March 02, 2009, 01:39:56 AM by r][m » Logged
jerome
Experienced poster
***
Offline Offline

France France

Posts: 36



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 02, 2009, 11:45:24 PM »
hello,
a new behavior in the user account option for this version.
the user accounts ignore limits OFF function works only after a vfs save.
when ignore limit ON works directly.
Logged
chthonic
Tireless poster
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 121


I own the copyright to this image... "Back Off!"


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 05, 2009, 04:35:44 PM »
the only odd thign I have noted on my end is that the Live Template no longer functions with this build.

[suggestion]
add an option to force URL links to: target=_blank

this would be less hassle than searching the template code and adding the string if it does not exist.
Logged
crazyboris
Guest


Email
« Reply #12 on: March 07, 2009, 05:06:03 AM »
if you password protect a file and choose only to show passwordprotected files to logged in users.

if you do a search for that file it comes up in the list and can be downloaded without password.
so if you are a random user just doing a random search you can get access to protected files.
Logged
Alekc
Guest


Email
« Reply #13 on: March 07, 2009, 10:49:17 AM »
When I'm starting a file download with Google Chrome, and then abort it (at the prompt where to save) - HFS hangs up trying to send me this file.
I know, GC is a beta too, but...

All worked ok on IE7.
Logged
r][m
Insane poster
*****
Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 340


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: March 07, 2009, 11:56:37 AM »
crazyboris
Quote
if you password protect a file and choose only to show passwordprotected files to logged in users.

if you do a search for that file it comes up in the list and can be downloaded without password.
so if you are a random user just doing a random search you can get access to protected files.

That doesn't happen here (as far as my testing shows).
Could you give us more details on how you are doing this? What template and search code, etc.
It is of some concern to me, at least.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!


Google visited last this page May 19, 2012, 11:17:04 PM
anything