Testing build #260

[rejetto]

download @ www.dovedove.it/hfs/hfs260.exe

what's new
+ new default template
+ added "switch to easy/expert mode" for screen readers
* {.play system event.} renamed to {.play.}
- macros.log was never cleared

[Tha Jsta]

I noticed the build 260 version is over 2 MB, but the build 259 is not even 1 MB. Is it just me, or is the template included in this one or something.

[rejetto]

it's debugging info included.
it's normal for beta versions.

[f2065]

Errors with options MIME remained:

1. I can not remove a line "video/mpeg", "text/plain" and others. After Apply and OK they are restored!

2. Continuation of processing of the coincided masks!
For example, at me it is written:
*.htm | test/html
*.css | test/css
*.* | application/x-force-download

And in this case in browsers FireFox and Opera CSS comes with MIME-type x-force-download, and they do not process it. Before such problem was not!!! At me always such adjustment MIME was, and CSS was given earlier with correct MIME-type. Has noticed this problem in last versions (259,260). If to clean "*.* | application/x-force-download" or to change a mask - that CSS it is given correctly.

[ydwxb]

rejetto:
    it seems that the new template dose not work so good. internet explorer will be No response after i click a directory.Unless internet explorer is maximized.
    when I shield function outsideV,it is ok.

Code:

function outsideV(e, additionalMargin) {
/** outsideV.w || (outsideV.w = $(window));
if (!(e instanceof $))
e = $(e);
return e.offset().top + e.height() > outsideV.w.height() - (additionalMargin || 0) - ($.browser.opera ? 15 : 0);
**/ } // outsideV

[jonaseg]

Looove the new template!

[rejetto]

about the mime types, there are some bugs, and the new system is not flexible enough to say respect precedences (it's important that *.* is applied as last rule).
fixed in next build (261).

[rejetto]

    it seems that the new template dose not work so good. internet explorer will be No response after i click a directory.Unless internet explorer is maximized.
    when I shield function outsideV,it is ok.

what IE version are you testing?

[ydwxb]

what IE version are you testing?

i test it on ie6,winxp sp3 Simplified Chinese edition.in addition the "delete" function does not work,and the "get list" function does not work for chinese directory.

[timteka]

guys, i don't like the "paginator". how can i turn it off by default? (or completely disable this feature)

[Tha Jsta]

guys, i don't like the "paginator". how can i turn it off by default? (or completely disable this feature)

Yes, somebody who frequently downloads from my server does not like the page feature either, if that's what you are speaking of. He keeps disabling the pages thing that groups similar items I guess it is, so I have switched back to the old template altogether.

[ElSid]

Noticed a scan on my machine (just updated to version 260 a day before this happened which is why I posted here).  Probably a BOT from Google or what not.  I am concerned in that the files are behind a user name, but it appears that the BOT went through the directory.  I know HFS is not "industrial", but is this normal?  Is there a way of avoiding this in the future?

[Mars]

guys, i don't like the "paginator". how can i turn it off by default? (or completely disable this feature)

Yes, somebody who frequently downloads from my server does not like the page feature either, if that's what you are speaking of. He keeps disabling the pages thing that groups similar items I guess it is, so I have switched back to the old template altogether.

@timteka & @Tha Jsta

take the preview template

[rejetto]

replacing the whole template is often a bad solution.
the day i'll fix a problem, or add a new feature, who installed a "modified template" won't see any improvement.
you should always work by diff templates.

[rejetto]

Noticed a scan on my machine (just updated to version 260 a day before this happened which is why I posted here).  Probably a BOT from Google or what not.  I am concerned in that the files are behind a user name, but it appears that the BOT went through the directory.  I know HFS is not "industrial", but is this normal?  Is there a way of avoiding this in the future?

are you saying that you have password protected files that got downloaded from a bot that's supposed to don't know it?
could you please provide the information you used to determine that? any log?
i need to see why you think it's a bot, why you think it doesn't know your password, etc.