HFS: History: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
So I wished I had an alternative for such cases. | So I wished I had an alternative for such cases. | ||
In 2 afternoons, i built the first working version of HFS. | In 2 afternoons, i built the first working version of HFS. | ||
It was not meant to do what is doing right now for most of its users. | It was not meant to do what is doing right now for most of its users. | ||
Latest revision as of 11:11, 21 May 2009
These words are directly from the original author of HFS, me, rejetto.
In 2002, using some chat systems, I was tired of problems given by integrated file transfer. Here's a list of some problems I met
- the transfer failed without saying why
- scarily slow
- folders were not supported
- no resume
- no big files
- some file types were censored
- or no file transfer was available at all!
So I wished I had an alternative for such cases.
In 2 afternoons, i built the first working version of HFS. It was not meant to do what is doing right now for most of its users. This is the main reason of its far-from-perfect design.
to be continued