rejetto forum
February 12, 2012, 02:36:57 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: This forum is free, you do NOT need to register to post. But you may.
PROBLEMS? QUESTIONS? CLICK HERE!
Fill the survey!
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Poll
Question: Should HFS be changed so that the taskbar doesnt flash when hfs is the active window?
Yes - 1 (9.1%)
No - 1 (9.1%)
Don't Know...Dont Care - 9 (81.8%)
Total Voters: 11

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Alert on connection  (Read 1849 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Foggy
Insane poster
*****
Offline Offline

Australia Australia

Posts: 806


View Profile
« on: July 20, 2007, 03:34:02 AM »

I didnt know whether to class this as a bug or not so you can move it if you wish.

Its good how Hfs flashes the taskbar when a new connection is made but should it flash the taskbar when hfs is the active window. I just dont really see the point in that as you can see the connections list. But more to the point when the taskbar flashes and hfs is the active window if you keep using hfs it doesnt return to normal and you must click on it which then minimises it.

I can see 2 possible fixes for this
a)The taskbar doesnt flash when hfs is the active window.
or
b)The taskbar flashes when hfs is the active window but when you perform an action in hfs the taskbar returns to normal.

What does everyone else think of this?
Logged
maverick
Insane poster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1056


Computer Solutions


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 20, 2007, 04:13:57 AM »

That behavior doesn't bother me.
Logged

maverick
radd
Tireless poster
****
Offline Offline

Malaysia Malaysia

Posts: 145


venom_rx
View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: July 20, 2007, 05:29:28 AM »

That behavior doesn't bother me.
me either, but it shouldn't be that way. i think there are still peoples who dont like this thing. foggy's right
Logged
Michel
Regular poster
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 20


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2007, 06:03:38 AM »

I agree with Foggy.
Logged

------------------
Best regards,
Michel
rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
*
Offline Offline

Italy Italy

Posts: 11759


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2007, 11:42:50 AM »

a) i could apply this solution only if accepted by a large majority
b) this can't be done, AFAIK. this is the standard Windows behaviour and cannot be modified. let me know if i'm wrong.
Logged
radd
Tireless poster
****
Offline Offline

Malaysia Malaysia

Posts: 145


venom_rx
View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2007, 03:32:38 PM »

dont bother, not a big deal anyway.. hehe
Logged
rejetto forum
« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2007, 03:32:38 PM »

Do you like this software? Consider even $2
 Logged
Giant Eagle
Insane poster
*****
Offline Offline

Netherlands Netherlands

Posts: 533


>=3 RAWR!

no.body056@gmail.com
View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: July 20, 2007, 04:20:41 PM »

Its good how Hfs flashes the taskbar when a new connection is made

It does? O.o

until now i didnt even knew the taskbar flashed Tongue So i would have to agree with Maverick (that does not mean i have anything against changing it)
Logged

Rest in peace 500mhz server, you served me well...
New 1500mhz server DOA'ed on me >_>
New 2400mhz server up and running again Grin

rejetto
Administrator
Insane programmer
*
Offline Offline

Italy Italy

Posts: 11759


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: July 20, 2007, 04:31:50 PM »

It does? O.o

depends on your settings
Logged
Foggy
Insane poster
*****
Offline Offline

Australia Australia

Posts: 806


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: July 20, 2007, 11:41:20 PM »

I agree with the majority of people that this isnt an important issue, but I posted it anyway to see what everyone else thought of it because although it isnt terribly important I think that it should be that the taskbar doesnt flash when hfs is the active window.
ill add a poll to my first post to see what everyone thinks should happen.
Logged
radd
Tireless poster
****
Offline Offline

Malaysia Malaysia

Posts: 145


venom_rx
View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: July 21, 2007, 01:25:05 AM »

ok, im gonna see whether this thing going to make me mad or not.. hehe.. ill post my vote tonight
Logged
TSG
Operator
Insane poster
*****
Offline Offline

Australia Australia

Posts: 1916



View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: July 21, 2007, 05:35:51 AM »

I agree with maverick... we should be focusing on making HFS as stable as possible, lets get rid of these Access Violations and other major bugs people are finding.

Small things like this can be fixed later.

I'd like to see the to-do list get smaller before small things like this are worried about Tongue

http://www.rejetto.com/hfs/?f=todo
Logged

Foggy
Insane poster
*****
Offline Offline

Australia Australia

Posts: 806


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: July 21, 2007, 07:51:26 AM »

I agree with maverick... we should be focusing on making HFS as stable as possible, lets get rid of these Access Violations and other major bugs people are finding.

Small things like this can be fixed later.

I'd like to see the to-do list get smaller before small things like this are worried about Tongue

http://www.rejetto.com/hfs/?f=todo
that sounds entirely reasonable, I say just put it on the todo list and think about it again in a few months?
Logged
maverick
Insane poster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1056


Computer Solutions


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: July 21, 2007, 08:56:47 AM »

I agree with maverick... we should be focusing on making HFS as stable as possible, lets get rid of these Access Violations

Are people getting access violations?  I haven't see one for a while now. (many builds ago).
Logged

maverick
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!


Google visited last this page January 16, 2012, 02:35:53 PM